$5 to Save the Dunes?

Popular Sections
-Bulletin Board
-What's New
-Home
-Fees and permits

Editorials and other enlightening thoughts
Cooking a Turkey at the dunes
Duners hike too!

Peirson's Milk Vetch (PMV)
-The threat explained
-PMV photos
-Why transplanting won't work
-Map of closed areas

Information for Vendors
ISDRA Vendor Program

General Information
- $5 to Save the Dunes?

Brooks' "Guide to the Washes"
-Curfew at Comp
-Actual weather from the WX station at the Ranger Station on Gecko Road
-Historic Weather Chart Average year-round temperature at ISDRA

Closest weather to ISDRA
- Imperial Weather
- Yuma Weather
- Brawley Weather

Other Info
-Classified Ads
-GPS Coordinates of favorite spots in the dunes
-Rookies Pages - FAQs
-Dunes Geology
-Satellite Images of ISDRA

Services
-RV Dump Stations
-Urgent Care Centers

Legal Information
-ISDRA Law Enforcement FAQs

-BLM's LE FAQ Page
-Rules & Regulations
-Fees
-California OHV Laws

Goverment Agency Programs
-Noise Regs

-RAMP
-CA Off Highway Vehicle Commission


American Sand Association (ASA)
- $5 to Save the Dunes?
-What is the ASA?
-Join the ASA
-ASA Sponsors
-ASA Merchandise Catalog
-ASA Chapters
-ASA Information
-Checkered Flags
-Donate online to the ASA
-Donate via snail-mail
-ASA Non Profit Status
- Safe Duning Brochure

Bob Mason - ASA President
ASA Board of Directors:


Send questions or comments about this site to the Send TRT related email to the . Copyright © 2001, 2002 GlamisOnLine. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of GlamisOnLine is prohibited All rights reserved. GlamisOnLine and the GOL logo are trademarks of GlamisOnLine. All other product names and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.

 

Ver: sideNavFooter.ssi

By V. J. Brunasso - December 2002

For those that are not familiar: Each year, the BLM El Centro Field Office asks for and receives approx. a million dollars from the California Department of Parks and Recreation’s Off Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) grant program. The OHMVR is commonly know as the Green Sticker Commission.

Without these dollars, many visitor services would have to be curtailed at the ISDRA. We all know what that would possibly bring us: a carrying capacity, control on alcohol, and more restrictions at the Imperial Sand Dunes. It looks like that is exactly what is in store for us. Read on to see how the environmentalists are working the system.

First a little history: These dollars are generated by our green and red sticker fees and to a much greater degree, the tax on gasoline we pay at the pump. Normally this tax is goes to roads. However, since we are using it off road, it is earmarked for the off road community. Seventy percent of it is to go toward improving, providing, and maintaining off road areas. The remaining 30% is to go to Conversation and Enforcement (C&E).

This money is dispersed through a grant system. The grants are approved by a 7-member board known as the Off Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Commission. The members are appointed as follows: 3 by the Governor, 2 by the Speaker of the Assembly, and 2 by the Senate Rules Committee. Remember that the next time you vote or you are asked to write a letter.

Unbelievably, four of the 7 members are staunch environmentalists. John Brissenden, an OHMVR commissioner whose tenure doesn’t end until January 2005, stated in the December 5&6 OHMVR meeting that he’d never approve money for increasing OHV use.

In the December 4th TRT conference call, Ed Waldheim, of CORVA, related a conversation he recently had with Paul Spitler. Spitler, once the director of the California Wilderness Coalition, also holds a seat on the OHMVR Commission: his term does not end until January of 2005.

Spitler stated that he wants all closures at the ISDRA to become permanent, no new areas to be opened, carrying capacities placed in force, and controls placed on the drinking situation at the dunes.

To force his personal agenda upon us, he has spearheaded a movement within the OHMVR Commission to withhold the ISDRA grant unless these provisions are in the new management plan due to come out shortly. . There are now also many strings and environmental requirements placed on the grants that it is becoming no longer feasible or cost effective for the BLM to pursue a grant from the OHMVR. This in effect is cutting off the funding that is required by the BLM to operate the ISDRA.

This flies in the face of the state codes that govern the OHMVR as you can see in the link below.

The question looming ahead of us is: Where is the funding for the ISDRA going to come from when the BLM El Centro Field Office is forced to look elsewhere?

Here's a link to some search results pertaining to California State codes.
OHMVR search results

SECTION 5090.01-5090.13 is the code section that set up the OHMVR and spells out their purpose. Here's just a part of it. The bold is mine. Quote:
5090.01. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the
Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Act of 1988.

5090.02. (a) The Legislature finds that off-highway motor vehicles are enjoying an ever-increasing popularity in California and that the indiscriminate and uncontrolled use of those vehicles may have a deleterious impact on the environment, wildlife habitats, native
wildlife, and native flora.
(b) The Legislature hereby declares that effectively managed areas and adequate facilities for the use of off-highway vehicles and conservation and enforcement are essential for ecologically balanced recreation.
(c) Accordingly, it is the intent of the Legislature that:
(1) Existing off-highway motor vehicle recreational areas, facilities, and opportunities be expanded and be managed in a manner consistent with this chapter, in particular to maintain sustained long-term use.
(2) New off-highway motor vehicle recreational areas, facilities, and opportunities be provided and managed pursuant to this chapter in a manner that will sustain long-term use.


SECTION 5090.50-5090.56 contains interesting code on grants. Quote:
5090.50. Grants may be made to cities, counties, and appropriate districts for the planning, acquisition, development, construction, maintenance, administration, operation, and conservation of trails, trailheads, areas, and other facilities for the use of off-highway motor vehicles that are in accordance with local plans and any plans for off-highway motor vehicle recreation areas and trails prepared by the division and for the enforcement of laws and regulations regarding the use of off-highway vehicles within the project site.
Every applicant for a grant shall comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). This paragraph is declaratory of, and does not constitute a change in, existing law.


SECTION 5090.30-5090.36 is very interesting to read - it's one of the links that is returned when you click the "OHMVR search results" link above.

You can also do your own search by Clicking here .
You’ll need to check the "Public Resources Code" box and scroll down to enter search words.

To me, it makes no sense to have a commission whose majority opposes OHV recreation when it is the State mandated duty of that commission to foster it. There are plenty of rules in place to provide for environmental concerns. We are getting the short end of a very green stick.