|
By V. J. Brunasso - December 2002
For those that are not familiar: Each year, the BLM
El Centro Field Office asks for and receives approx. a million dollars
from the California Department of Parks and Recreations Off
Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) grant program. The OHMVR
is commonly know as the Green Sticker Commission.
Without these dollars, many visitor services would have to be curtailed
at the ISDRA. We all know what that would possibly bring us: a carrying
capacity, control on alcohol, and more restrictions at the Imperial
Sand Dunes. It looks like that is exactly what is in store for us.
Read on to see how the environmentalists are working the system.
First a little history: These dollars are generated by our green
and red sticker fees and to a much greater degree, the tax on gasoline
we pay at the pump. Normally this tax is goes to roads. However,
since we are using it off road, it is earmarked for the off road
community. Seventy percent of it is to go toward improving, providing,
and maintaining off road areas. The remaining 30% is to go to Conversation
and Enforcement (C&E).
This money is dispersed through a grant system. The grants are
approved by a 7-member board known as the Off Highway Motor Vehicle
Recreation (OHMVR) Commission. The members are appointed as follows:
3 by the Governor, 2 by the Speaker of the Assembly, and 2 by the
Senate Rules Committee. Remember that the next time you vote or
you are asked to write a letter.
Unbelievably, four of the 7 members are staunch environmentalists.
John Brissenden, an OHMVR commissioner whose tenure doesnt
end until January 2005, stated in the December 5&6 OHMVR meeting
that hed never approve money for increasing OHV use.
In the December 4th TRT conference call, Ed Waldheim, of CORVA,
related a conversation he recently had with Paul Spitler. Spitler,
once the director of the California Wilderness Coalition, also holds
a seat on the OHMVR Commission: his term does not end until January
of 2005.
Spitler stated that he wants all closures at the ISDRA to become
permanent, no new areas to be opened, carrying capacities placed
in force, and controls placed on the drinking situation at the dunes.
To force his personal agenda upon us, he has spearheaded a movement
within the OHMVR Commission to withhold the ISDRA grant unless these
provisions are in the new management plan due to come out shortly.
. There are now also many strings and environmental requirements
placed on the grants that it is becoming no longer feasible or cost
effective for the BLM to pursue a grant from the OHMVR. This in
effect is cutting off the funding that is required by the BLM to
operate the ISDRA.
This flies in the face of the state codes that govern the OHMVR
as you can see in the link below.
The question looming ahead of us is: Where is the funding for the
ISDRA going to come from when the BLM El Centro Field Office is
forced to look elsewhere?
Here's a link to some search results pertaining to California State
codes.
OHMVR
search results
SECTION 5090.01-5090.13 is the code section that set up the OHMVR
and spells out their purpose. Here's just a part of it. The bold
is mine. Quote:
5090.01. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the
Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Act of 1988.
5090.02. (a) The Legislature finds that off-highway motor vehicles
are enjoying an ever-increasing popularity in California and that
the indiscriminate and uncontrolled use of those vehicles may have
a deleterious impact on the environment, wildlife habitats, native
wildlife, and native flora.
(b) The Legislature hereby declares that effectively managed areas
and adequate facilities for the use of off-highway vehicles and
conservation and enforcement are essential for ecologically balanced
recreation.
(c) Accordingly, it is the intent of the Legislature that:
(1) Existing off-highway motor vehicle recreational areas, facilities,
and opportunities be expanded and be managed in a manner consistent
with this chapter, in particular to maintain sustained long-term
use.
(2) New off-highway motor vehicle recreational areas, facilities,
and opportunities be provided and managed pursuant to this chapter
in a manner that will sustain long-term use.
SECTION 5090.50-5090.56 contains interesting code on grants. Quote:
5090.50. Grants may be made to cities, counties, and appropriate
districts for the planning, acquisition, development, construction,
maintenance, administration, operation, and conservation of trails,
trailheads, areas, and other facilities for the use of off-highway
motor vehicles that are in accordance with local plans and any plans
for off-highway motor vehicle recreation areas and trails prepared
by the division and for the enforcement of laws and regulations
regarding the use of off-highway vehicles within the project site.
Every applicant for a grant shall comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). This
paragraph is declaratory of, and does not constitute a change in,
existing law.
SECTION 5090.30-5090.36 is very interesting to read - it's one of
the links that is returned when you click the "OHMVR search
results" link above.
You can also do your own search by Clicking
here .
Youll need to check the "Public Resources Code"
box and scroll down to enter search words.
To me, it makes no sense to have a commission whose majority opposes
OHV recreation when it is the State mandated duty of that commission
to foster it. There are plenty of rules in place to provide for
environmental concerns. We are getting the short end of a very green
stick.
|